|
Library |
|
|
|
WHY A DC INSTEAD OF AN ENGINE DRIVEN SYSTEM? |
| Glacier Bay manufacturers all types of drive systems including
engine and hydraulic as well as AC and DC electric. However, in most cases we do not
recommend an engine driven system for serious offshore cruisers. The reason for this is
simple - it will take much more engine running time to maintain your refrigeration system
with an engine driven compressor than it will to replace the electricity used by our DC
system. This is true even with our own engine driven system which, according to the Cruising World Magazine tests (June 95), requires
1/3 less run time than Sea Frost and Grunert and only about 1/2 that of
Technautics.
While this comment may seem to fly in the face of conventional wisdom, the simple truth is that a properly set up battery bank and alternator system does a much better job of capturing the available power from an engine than does a directly driven refrigeration compressor. To illustrate how the DC approach can shorten your engine run time, consider that a typical engine drive system would usually take 45 minutes to 1 hour of engine run time twice per day to "charge" the plates. (In the Cruising World Magazine refrigeration systems test, the Glacier Bay engine-driven system took 1.1 hours per day, the Sea Frost and Grunert took 1.6 and the Technautics took 2 hours of engine run time per day to cool a 5 cu.ft. refrigerator and 3 cu.ft. freezer (with 4" of insulation) in the tropics.) Remember these numbers while we investigate the efficiency of the DC alternative. The first step is to find out how much electrical power the DC system requires to cool these same boxes. Fortunately, the Cruising World test also gives us a good foundation for making this assessment. In the DC system portion of the test a high-efficiency Glacier Bay refrigeration system (cooling the same boxes) consumed 57 amp-hrs of electricity from the battery bank . Therefore, the question is, "Does it take less or more than 1.5 to 2 hours of engine running to replace 57 amp-hours of charge back into battery bank?". How long it will take to replace this energy depends primarily on three things.
Lead-acid type batteries have an average "acceptance rate" (ie. recharge rate) of 25% of full bank capacity under normal 50% to 80% cycling. Gel-Cel type batteries have a 40% acceptance rate under the same 50% to 80% cycling conditions. The newest "AGM" (Absorbed Glass Mat) batteries have a full 100% acceptance rate. (NOTE: This is why the house battery bank should never be divided into two banks. To do so simply cuts the acceptance rate in half effectively doubling the recharge time that would otherwise be possible.) Once your battery bank size and type are determined, your alternator(s) should be sized so that, when hot, it will provide an output equal to the acceptance rate of your battery bank. Remember that it is possible to charge a single battery bank with two separate alternators. Consider using that place on your engine where you might otherwise install an engine driven refrigeration compressor to be used as a home for a second alternator instead! Now, considering the above information and the need to replace 57 amp-hours back into the bank you can use the charts below to accurately predict your required engine run time. |
BATTERY TYPE - "LEAD ACID"
BANK SIZE |
RECOMMENDED |
ENGINE RUN TIME REQUIRED |
400 |
100 |
43 |
600 |
150 |
26 |
800 |
200 |
21 |
1000 |
250 |
16 |
1200 |
300 |
13 |
BATTERY TYPE - "GEL-CEL"
BANK SIZE |
RECOMMENDED |
ENGINE RUN TIME REQUIRED |
400 |
160 |
25 |
600 |
240 |
16 |
800 |
320 |
12 |
1000 |
400 |
9 |
BATTERY TYPE - "AGM"
BANK SIZE |
RECOMMENDED |
ENGINE RUN TIME REQUIRED |
200 |
200 |
17 |
400 |
400 |
9 |
600 |
600 |
6 |
| Now, if we look only at how long you must run your engine to
replace the energy the refrigeration system is using, we see that, in all cases, it is
reduced to only a small portion of that required by an engine driven system. In
the most extreme examples given, the DC system requires only 6 minutes of engine running
per day vs 2 hours for the engine-driven system. While this level of efficiency
requires very heavy-duty alternators, even relatively modest alternator/battery bank
combinations result in a Glacier Bay DC system which requires only about 1/3rd as much
engine run time as the Sea Frost or Technautics engine-driven systems. OPTIONAL ECM DIGITAL CONTROLS OTHER DC SYSTEM ADVANTAGES
See our
|
|
Return to Home Page |
|
|