Thermal Insulation

 
Vacuum Insulation Panels (VIPs) Principles,
Performance and Lifespan

 

Introduction
It has been know for a long time that the insulation value of some materials can be dramatically increased by maintaining them in an evacuated environment.  How much vacuum is required and how much improvement is gained depends on the material and the level of vacuum.

The "ultimate" example of vacuum insulation is the Dewar's Flask, commonly known as a Thermos bottle.  In a Dewar's Flask, no insulation "material" is used at all.  Instead, the space between the dual walls of a cylinder is completely (99.999999%) evacuated.  With virtually no molecules of gas available to transport heat between the two walls, the "R" value is extremely high - typically R250 or better.   Unfortunately, the Dewar's Flask is not very versatile.  Because there is no support structure for the walls (the support structure itself would transfer heat), the shape of the flask is limited to round, oval or cylindrical.  Additionally, since even a few molecules of gas will destroy its insulation value, the cylinder walls must be absolutely impermeable to gas and moisture.  This limits the the wall material to either specially treated glass or metal, both of which have a tendency to conduct significant amounts of heat at areas where the walls are joined together.

Making A Flat Vacuum Insulation Panel
In an effort to improve insulation technology beyond that of common foams and fiberglass batt (which rely on "trapped air"), engineers have spent years and many millions of dollars trying to construct a flat panel that would take advantage of the superior insulation value afforded by a vacuum.  The task has proved much more difficult than would at first seem apparent.  Major technical challenges include:

1. Support of the flat walls.
Atmospheric pressure exerts approximately 15 psi (pound per square inch) of pressure on the evacuated panel.  This means that a vacuum panel which is 20" square has 3 tons (6,000 lbs.) of force compressing it.  Since it is not practical to make the walls thick enough to support such pressure (remember, the walls themselves will conduct heat where they join together), an suitable internal support material is needed.   This material (often called a "core" material) has to be strong enough to take the tremendous pressure without collapsing and yet not transfer too much heat itself.
2. Gas Impermeable Membrane
Since the thermal performance of the panel will be proportionate to the internal pressure, a membrane (i.e. "wall") material was needed which would minimize the influx of gases into the evacuated space.  Additionally, this material had to be low in cost, easy to work with and easy to join together in an air-tight seal.  Lastly, the material has to be thin enough so as not to conduct a significant amount of heat around the edges thus providing a "short circuit" for heat flow.
3.  Getters And Desiccants
Getters and desiccants are used to absorb gases (getters) and moisture (desiccants) within the evacuated envelope and prevent (or at least delay) an elevation of the internal pressure and the degradation in "R" value that would result.  This gas and moisture may enter the vacuum panel in a number of ways including permeation of the membrane material, permeation of the sealing seams and outgassing of the core material and membrane itself.

Materials Used in Today's VIPs
Vacuum insulation panels which offer excellent performance and long life (15+ years) have been around since the mid 1950's.  Unfortunately, the production process to make them has been both expensive and time-consuming.  As such, few companies have been able to develop more than small niche markets for the material.  However, in the past four years worldwide research on vacuum insulation technology has accelerated dramatically.  The goal of this research is to develop new materials and processes that will significantly reduce VIP production time and cost.  For the winners in this technological race the potential payoff can be tremendous as VIPs are projected to take over major portions of the world insulation market in the near future if they succeed.

Core Materials
In VIPs, the core material serves two major functions.  First, it provides physical support to the membrane (or barrier) film envelope so that it does not collapse in on itself when the vacuum is applied.  Secondly, the core material acts to interrupt the flow (free mean path) of the molecules of gas which still remain in the evacuated space, thereby reducing their ability to transfer heat between the walls of the VIP.   Established and proven core materials include Perlit, mineral powder, mineral fiber, fiberglass and silica.  While most of these materials are not very expensive in their raw form, they require considerable handling and "pre-processing" which greatly increases the cost of the end product.  A number of new core materials have recently been developed.  These fall into two broad categories open-cell foam and carbon/silica aerogels.  Dow Chemicals and ICI Chemicals have introduced new foam core materials consist of specially formulated open-cell polyurethane (ICI) and polystyrene (Dow) foams.  They are designed to allow faster evacuation and easier handling than the older materials identified above.  While these new materials permit much lower-cost production, they are much more sensitive to the influx of gas and moisture than were the older materials and have a greater tendency to outgas.  As such, they panels produced with foam cores have an inherently shorter life span than do panels made with most other materials.  How much shorter is a question under much debate.   Ultimately the success or failure of these foams will depend on the progress made towards improved membrane films and getters.

Glacier Bay's BARRIER Ultra-Rtm is the first commercially available superinsulation panel to utilize a carbon/silica aerogel core.  While considerably more expensive than other core materials, aerogel achieves extremely high R-values with less vacuum than would be required with other types of cores.   Additionally, aerogel (like precipitated silica) acts as its own getter and desiccant.  These properties combine to give aerogel-based panels a useful life unmatched by any other core technology.

Membrane Films
The membrane film is the materials which forms the walls of the VIP.  It is the job of the membrane film to provide an effective barrier against all atmospheric gases and moisture so that the vacuum can be maintained.  The impermeable membrane materials are glass and metal.  Unfortunately glass is far too fragile.  Metal can be used but significantly reduces the average insulation value of finished panel due to the conductance of heat around the edges where the walls are joined (i.e. "edge effect").   Additional disadvantages of a pure metal membrane is the high cost of forming and welding the panel.

Because of these problems, many alternative and compromise solutions have been tried.  In some films, a very thin metal film (usually aluminum) is reinforced by laminating a plastic film on each side.  A  special plastic with a low melting temperature is then added so as to allow the finished laminate to be "heat sealed" rather than welded.  These films can have excellent barrier properties but can still conduct significant heat around the edges.  In an effort to reduce this "edge effect" even further, some films use a "sputter-coated" thin film deposition technique to get the metal layer even thinner.  When done correctly, these films offer a good compromise between the solid metal films and  pure plastic laminates.  Unfortunately, quality control and good  consistency in the metal deposition can be a problem making extensive post-production panel testing imperative.

Films comprised entirely of plastic laminates can be used in situations where a great deal of getter/desiccant is available (such as when a silica or aerogel core is used), or when the required panel life is not too great.  These films can consist of up to nine layers of various plastics, each of which offers good barrier properties against a particular gas.  Because these films have virtually no "edge effect", they are the focus of much research and have been used widely in the past with the older core materials.    The intolerance of the newer "foam" type core materials to gas influx (see chart below), combined with their minimal getter/desiccant capacity, precludes the use of today's plastic laminates with these cores.

Getters and Desiccants
Getters are chemicals which absorb gases, desiccants are chemicals which absorb moisture.   Getters and desiccants are used to extend the life of VIPs by absorbing unwanted gases and moisture which prevents a rise in pressure within the evacuated space.  To be effective, the getters and desiccants must be carefully matched to the kind and quantity of gas/moisture they will be expected to absorb.  They must also be capable of effectively absorbing and holding the gasses and moisture at the low pressures inside the VIP.  It is, therefore, important that the quantity and type used be selected in consideration of the core material, membrane film and required life expectancy.

It is worthwhile to note that several of the older core materials as well as aerogels are themselves getters and desiccants when properly pre-treated.  For this reason many early panels did not require additional chemicals to be added.

The Lifespan Of VIPs
The life expectancy of a vacuum insulation panel is determined by a number of factors. Specifically, these are;

1.  The initial vacuum level of the panel.
2. The permeation rate of the membrane film.
3. The outgassing (if any) of the core material and membrane film.
4. The permeation rate of the membrane sealing edge
5. The quantity and effectiveness of the getter and desiccant.
6.  The effect of pressure rise on the specific core material.

Initial Vacuum Level
Unlike a Dewar's Flask, flat vacuum panels do not maintain a "perfect vacuum".  Most flat vacuum panels are initially evacuated to an internal pressure of about .05 torr (.066 mbar or .00097 psi). To evacuate the panels to a lower level would add significantly to the production cost and, in most cases, does not result in a higher R value.  While this level of evacuation is typically the goal, variations in the production process can cause some panels to only achieve only partial evacuation.   Panels which start out with a higher internal pressure will have a proportionately shorter effective lifespan than will an, otherwise identical, panel which is more thoroughly evacuated.

Membrane Permeation Rate
As discussed earlier in this paper, only welded metal and glass are completely air tight and these materials have significant disadvantages in VIP applications. All membrane films in use today permit some molecules of gas and moisture to pass through over time.   How much gas passes through the membrane and, how effectively the core and getter deal with this gas, will have a major effect on panel life.    The amount of permeation through a particular membrane film will depend on the material of its construction and the resistance of this material to degradation during handling in the production process.  Some films will handle the stress of folding and processing (a necessary part of panel production) much better than others.  A given film can perform very well in laboratory permeation tests but begin to permeate too easily when flexed or folded.

Outgassing
Most materials release gases (outgas) when placed in a low pressure environment.   The kind and quantity of gas released, as well as the length of time the outgassing will continue, varies from material to material.  The released gases can contribute substantially to the rise in internal pressure (i.e. loss of vacuum) of a VIP.  In some cases, the rate at which gas released from the core and membrane materials exceeds that at which it permeates through the membrane.  A few materials, such as silica and metal do not outgas at all, while other materials never stop outgassing.  The core and membrane materials used by a particular manufacturer will determine what, if any, impact outgassing will have on the life of their product.

Sealing Edge Permeation
All VIPs are comprised of membrane films which are sealed at the edges to form an envelope for the core material.  In earlier panels which used 100% metal membrane films, these edges were welded or soldered.  In most of today's membrane films, a thin layer of low temperature plastic is laminated to the inside of the film so than it can be sealed using heat and pressure.  Unfortunately, these layers of heat-sealing plastic do not have the same resistance to gas and moisture permeation as does the rest of the film.  To minimize the negative impact of permeation of the sealing layer, manufacturers use as thin a film layer as possible combined with a wide seal lip. The compromise here is that it is much more difficult to make a good quality seal using a thin sealing layer and and wide lip than it is to make one with a thick layer and narrow lip.   A thick plastic layer has the ability to "fill in" small wrinkles and crevices which a thin layer does not.  How thin a layer a particular VIP manufacturer will need depends on their sealing equipment as well as their process and quality control.

Getters and Desiccants
Continuous absorption of extraneous gases and moisture is a vital consideration in extending the useful life of any VIP.  By trapping and holding these gases (whether from outgassing or permeation), the getters and desiccants prevent the internal pressure of the panel from rising, thereby preserving an "as new" insulation value.   In silica-based panels (such as the Glacier Bay BARRIER panels), the core material also serves as the getter and desiccant.  In foam-based panels (such as VacuPanel, Inc.'s VIPs), the core material has no absorbent capacity at all.  It is, therefore, necessary to add these chemicals into the VIP envelope.  These chemicals much be matched to the types of gases which the foam outgasses.  Since the addition of these getters adds cost and reduces the insulation value of the foam panels, a compromise must be made with the desire to extend panel life.  One obvious benefit of using silica as a core material is the very large amount of getter which is present.

Effect of Pressure Rise
All vacuum insulation panels rely on high vacuum to give their high "R" values.  As the level of vacuum in the envelope decreases - so does the "R" value.  However,  the relationship between internal pressure rise and decreasing "R" value varies tremendously with different core materials.  The graph below compares the effect of rising internal pressure on Glacier Bay's BARRIER Ultra-R aerogel-based VIPs and panels produced using other core materials.  Note that while all materials offer satisfactory performance at the highest evacuation levels, there is a dramatic difference between them with only slight increases in internal pressure.

 

Core_comparison.gif (7441 bytes)

 

Summary
Reliably projecting the life span for a particular combination of vacuum insulation panel technologies is very difficult even for a well equipped laboratory.   As we have discussed above, the interaction of many factors considered and quantified.  For the end user, an understanding of the technology and reliance on the reputation of the manufacturer is the only safeguard.  It is easy for a manufacturer to make great sounding claims on "R" value and panels life, and very difficult for the end user to verify them.  One guide is a close look at the manufacturer's warranty.  Too many disclaimers and you may be in for trouble.

It is possible to make vacuum insulation panels that will maintain "R" values several times than of standard foam for well over 20 years.   Older VIP technologies using silica core materials and highly permeable (by today's standards) plastic laminate membrane films provided 15-20 years of relatively stable "R" value.  This was possible because of the extremely moisture and gas absorbing capacity of the silica core and, because silica-based panels are not particularly sensitive to small elevations in internal pressure.  By combining silica core materials with newer, less permeable membrane materials projected life spans of 50+ years can be realistic.  Unfortunately, high cost remains a major barrier to wide scale adaptation of silica-based VIPs.

VIPs made recently with low-cost foam core materials give reason to hope for high "R" value, reasonably long life  and much cheaper vacuum insulation panels in the near future.  However, at this time, panels made with this technology exhibit high insulation value but very short life.  While such short-life panels may be useful in some applications, purchasers requiring a long-life insulation product should be wary.

Aerogel panels represent an interesting compromise between the older silica and newer foam core technologies.  It is unlikely that aerogel-based panels will ever be as cheap to purchase as those made with foam or as expensive as those made with silica.  Similarly, it is equally unlikely that foam-based panel technology will ever improve to the point where these panels will last as long or have as high an R-value as those made with aerogel.

In conclusion, the best choice of technologies for your panels will depend on your requirements.  Those looking for maximum life and R-value will want aerogel or silica-based panels.  Those seeking a lower-cost solution who can also tolerate a shorter life may want to consider foam-based panels.

 

Return to the Technical Library

Return to the Home Page.
 
.